Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science

Author:

Blyth Mark

Abstract

This article questions the centrality of interest-based explanation in political science. Through an examination of the “turn to ideas” undertaken in the past decade by rationalist and nonrationalist scholars in both comparative politics and international relations, it seeks to make three points. First, interests are far from the unproblematic and ever-ready explanatory instruments we assume them to be. Second, the ideational turn of historical institutionalism and constructivist international relations theory marks a substantive theoretical shift in the field precisely because it problematizes notions of action that take interest as given. Third, such scholarship emerged from, and in reaction to, the inherent limits of rationalist treatments of interests and ideas. That it did so suggests that progress in the discipline may be more dialectic—rather than linear or paradigmatic—than we realize.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference64 articles.

1. Finnemore Martha .1996a National Interests in International Society.Ithaca: Cornell University Press

2. Katzenstein Peter J .1996 Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security.In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics,ed. Peter J. Katzenstein .New York: Columbia University Press,1–32.

3. Kratochwil Friedrich V .1993 The embarrassment of changes: Neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics.Review of International Studies 19: 1,63–81.

4. Popkin Samuel L .1979 The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam.Berkeley: University of California Press

5. Knight Jack , and Douglass C. North .1997 Explaining economic change: The interplay between cognition and institutions.Legal Theory 3,211–26.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3