Sending Signals or Building Bridges? Digital Sovereignty in EU Communicative and Co‐Ordinative Discourse

Author:

Wenzelburger Georg1ORCID,König Pascal D.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of European Social Research Saarland University Saarbrücken

2. Department of Political Science and Public Administration Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam

Abstract

AbstractThis article studies the role that ‘digital sovereignty’ performs in the EU's digital policy discourse comparing speeches by high‐level European Commission officials and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). It indicates that the concept of digital sovereignty is not mentioned very frequently, neither in the European Parliament (EP) nor in the public statements of top EU officials. It is furthermore not closely linked to specific policy ideas, not even to the idea of promoting European values in the world as a way of openly projecting digital sovereignty outward. EP actors mainly refer to policy‐related aspects of digital sovereignty, and these show systematic affinities to parties' ideologies – primarily along an axis of economic development versus protecting personal rights – and to EP committees. Hence, digital sovereignty does not seem to mainly serve as normative idea directed at the public sphere but emerges as a common denominator to which different relevant actors within the EU decision‐making system can equally relate.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. What Are We Talking About When We Talk About Digital Protectionism?;Aaronson S.A.;World Trade Review,2019

2. BarshefskyC(2020)EU Digital Protectionism Risks Damaging Ties With the U.S. Financial Times. London. Available from:https://www.ft.com/content/9edea4f5‐5f34‐4e17‐89cd‐f9b9ba698103[Accessed 18 January 2022].

3. New Institutionalist Leadership – How the New European Council‐Dominated Crisis Governance Paradoxically Strengthened the Role of EU Institutions;Beach D.;Journal of European Integration,2020

4. Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change;Béland D.;Journal of European Public Policy,2009

5. Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Coalition Building, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Power Relations;Béland D.;Journal of European Public Policy,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3