The Use of Diagrams in Planning for Report Writing

Author:

Manalo Emmanuel,Ohmes Laura

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we investigated 32 undergraduate university students’ use of diagrams in planning to write two coursework reports. For both reports, the students were asked to submit a diagrammatic plan for what they were going to write. Prior to their first plan, no instruction was provided about how to use diagrams for planning. However, prior to the second plan, the students were provided instruction on the use of sketchnoting, which is one method for creating visual notes and organizing ideas. For the first plan, only 31% actually submitted a diagram plan, with the majority submitting a text-based plan. However, for the second plan, the proportion who submitted a diagram plan increased to 66%, but they also reported experiencing more difficulty in creating their plans compared to those who submitted text-based plans. The students’ plans and reports were scored for various quality features, analysis of which revealed that, for the second report, diagram plans had a better logical structure than text plans. More importantly, second reports created with diagram plans were also found to have a better logical structure than those created with text plans. The findings indicate that many students require instruction to be able to create diagrammatic plans, but that creating such plans can be helpful in structuring their written work.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference16 articles.

1. Harris, K.R., Santangelo, T., Graham, S.: Metacognition and strategies instruction in writing. In: Waters, H.S., Schneider, W. (eds.) Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction, pp. 226–256. Guilford, New York (2010)

2. Flower, L., Hayes, J.R.: A cognitive process theory of writing. Coll. Compos. Commun. 32, 365–387 (1981)

3. Flower, L., Schriver, K.A., Carey, L., Haas, C., Hayes, J.R.: Planning in writing (ED313701). ERIC (1989). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED313701

4. Isnard, N., Piolat, A.: The effects of different types of planning on the writing of argumentative text. In: Eigler, G., Jechle, T. (eds.) Writing. Current Trends in European Research, pp. 121–132. Hochschul Verlag, Freiburg (1993)

5. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Sci. 11, 65–99 (1987)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3