Abstract
AbstractGlobal Climate Models are the main tools for climate projections. Since many models exist, it is common to use Multi-Model Ensembles to reduce biases and assess uncertainties in climate projections. Several approaches have been proposed to combine individual models and extract a robust signal from an ensemble. Among them, the Multi-Model Mean (MMM) is the most commonly used. Based on the assumption that the models are centered around the truth, it consists in averaging the ensemble, with the possibility of using equal weights for all models or to adjust weights to favor some models. In this paper, we propose a new alternative to reconstruct multi-decadal means of climate variables from a Multi-Model Ensemble, where the local performance of the models is taken into account. This is in contrast with MMM where a model has the same weight for all locations. Our approach is based on a computer vision method called graph cuts and consists in selecting for each grid point the most appropriate model, while at the same time considering the overall spatial consistency of the resulting field. The performance of the graph cuts approach is assessed based on two experiments: one where the ERA5 reanalyses are considered as the reference, and another involving a perfect model experiment where each model is in turn considered as the reference. We show that the graph cuts approach generally results in lower biases than other model combination approaches such as MMM, while at the same time preserving a similar level of spatial continuity.
Funder
European Research Council
Joint Programming Initiative Climate and European Union
University of Lausanne
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Abramowitz G, Herger N, Gutmann E, Hammerling D, Knutti R, Leduc M, Lorenz R, Pincus R, Schmidt GA (2019) Esd reviews: model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing. Earth Syst Dynam 10(1):91–105. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-91-2019
2. Ahmed K, Sachindra DA, Shahid S, Demirel MC, Chung ES (2019) Selection of multi-model ensemble of general circulation models for the simulation of precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature based on spatial assessment metrics. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23(11):4803–4824. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4803-2019
3. Bhat KS, Haran M, Terando A, Keller K (2011) Climate projections using Bayesian model averaging and space-time dependence. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 16(4):606–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-011-0069-3
4. Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G (2006) Graph cuts and efficient n-d image segmentation. Int J Comput Vis 70(2):109–131. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746427122&partnerID=40&md5=e251e15fac68cacd8e8d2aad7f0e81fe
5. Boykov Y, Kolmogorov V (2004) An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(9):1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2004.60
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献