Assessing the Effect of Curricula Variation in Mathematics Teacher Education on Teaching Competency
-
Published:2023-12-02
Issue:4
Volume:4
Page:627-638
-
ISSN:2683-6467
-
Container-title:Mbeya University of Science and Technology Journal of Research and Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MJRD
Author:
Ezekiel Kihwele Jimmy1, Mgata Fred2
Affiliation:
1. Mzumbe University, Tanzania 2. Center for Teacher Education Research, Beijing Normal University, China
Abstract
Curriculum development processes at universities are decentralised, resulting in varying subject-matter mastery levels among graduates. The paper examined the effect of teacher education curricula variation on mathematics teachers’ competencies. The study employed a case study design with 18 mathematics teacher graduates from nine teacher education institutions working in the Manyara region. The study used in-depth interviews, open-ended questionnaires, and documentary review methods to collect data. The findings revealed that despite mathematics teachers’ mastery of the subject matter, their competence slightly varied in some topics. There are mismatches between courses at different universities and topics in secondary schools that affect teaching competencies among teachers. Decentralised curriculum development at teacher training institutions results in dissonant curricula that produce different qualities in teachers. Despite various capacity-building mechanisms, teachers inadequately elevate their competencies. The study recommends the development of compulsory modules across teacher education institutions to reflect secondary curriculum requirements.
Publisher
Mbeya University of Science and Technology
Reference41 articles.
1. Bar-Tal, S., Chamo, N., Ram, D., Snapir, Z., & Gilat, I. (2020). First steps in a second career: characteristics of the transition to the teaching profession among novice teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 660–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1708895 2. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Jentsch, A. (2020). Profiles of mathematics teachers’ competence and their relation to instructional quality. ZDM, 52(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01128-y 3. Bussey, T. J., Orgill, M., & Crippen, K. J. (2013). Variation theory: A theory of learning and a useful theoretical framework for chemical education research. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20145C 4. Cochran-Smith, M., Keefe, E. S., Carney, M. C., Sánchez, J. G., Olivo, M., & Smith, R. J. (2020). Teacher preparation at new graduate schools of education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(2), 8–37. 5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication Ltd.
|
|