Numerical simulations of recent and future evolution of Monte Perdido glacier
-
Published:2024-01-17
Issue:1
Volume:50
Page:3-19
-
ISSN:1697-9540
-
Container-title:Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:CIG
Author:
Mateos-García AnnaORCID, Santolaria-Otín MaríaORCID, Sola YolandaORCID, Alonso-González EstebanORCID, Otero JaimeORCID, Del Rio Luis Mariano, López-Moreno Juan IgnacioORCID, Revuelto JesúsORCID
Abstract
Glaciers are globally retreating due to climate change, and the Pyrenees Mountain range is no exception. This study uses the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM) to explore the dynamics of the Monte Perdido glacier, one of the largest remaining glaciers in the Pyrenees. We explored three calibration approaches to assess their performances when reproducing observed volume decreases. The first approach involved mass balance calibration using terrestrial laser scanning data from 2011 to 2022 and climate data from a nearby weather station. The second approach used terrestrial laser scanning calibration with default climate data provided by OGGM (GSWP3-W5E5). The third approach used default geodetic mass balance calibration and default climate data. By comparing these calibration strategies and analysing historical data (terrestrial laser scanning and ground penetrating radar), we obtain insights of the applicability of OGGM to this small, mild conditions, Pyrenean glacier. The first calibration approach is identified as the most effective, emphasising the importance of selecting appropriate climate data and calibration methods. Additionally, we conducted future volume projections using an ensemble of General Circulation Models (GCMs) under the RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The results indicate a potential decrease in total ice volume ranging from 91.60% to 95.16% by 2100, depending on the scenario. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of the Monte Perdido glacier’s behaviour and its response to climate change through the calibration of the OGGM, while also providing the first estimate of its future melting under different emission scenarios.
Publisher
Universidad de la Rioja
Reference56 articles.
1. Alonso-González, E., Aalstad, K., Baba, M.W., Revuelto, J., López-Moreno, J.I., Fiddes, J., Essery, R., Gascoin, S., 2022. The Multiple Snow Data Assimilation System (MuSA v1.0). Geoscientific Model Development 15, 9127–9155. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9127-2022 2. Arora, V.K., Scinocca, J.F., Boer, G.J., Christian, J.R., Denman, K.L., Flato, G.M., Kharin, V. V, Lee, W.G., Merryfield, W.J., 2011. Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases. Geophysical Research Letters 38 (5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046270 3. Belart, J. M. C., 2018. Mass balance of Icelandic glaciers in variable climate. (Ph.D. thesis). University of Iceland; University of Toulouse III, Paul Sabatier. 4. Beniston, M., 2003. Climatic Change in Mountain Regions: A Review of Possible Impacts. Climatic Change 59, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024458411589 5. Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J.B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I.A., Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J.E., 2013. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate. Geoscientific Model Development 6 (3), 687–720. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013
|
|