Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, P. R. China.
2. College of Resources and Environment,
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. China.
Abstract
Ecological representativeness of protected area networks is essential for leveraging protected areas to achieve conservation goals. On the basis of China’s vegetation map and the spatial data of protected areas, we analyze the representativeness of China’s network of protected areas in protecting distinct types of terrestrial natural ecosystems. Across the major ecosystem classes, wetland, alpine tundra, and grassland have more than 20% of their areas being protected, while shrub, forest, and desert are less covered by protected areas. At the level of ecosystem subclass, 90.2% of the 691 types of natural ecosystems have at least some areas covered by protected areas, but of the rarest natural ecosystem types (i.e., their land areas less than 100 km
2
), about half were poorly protected (i.e., less than 5% of their extents are protected). A small percentage (14.7%) of natural ecosystem with high human pressure is included in protected areas, whereas 27% of natural ecosystem with the lowest intensity of human pressure occurs in protected areas. To enhance the ecological representativeness of China’s protected areas, we suggest strengthening the protection of underrepresented ecosystems, especially those exposed to high human pressure, by expanding protected area networks and delineating ecological redlines.
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference53 articles.
1. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital
2. IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2018. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf
3. Prince S Von Maltitz G Zhang F Byrne K Driscoll C Eshel G Kust G Martínez-Garza C Metzger J Midgley G et al. Status and trends of land degradation and restoration and associated changes in biodiversity and ecosystem functions. In: Montanarella L Scholes R and Brainich A editors. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration . Bonn (Germany): Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; p. 221–338.
4. Discussion about natural reserve and construction of national ecological security pattern;Hou P;Geogr Res,2017
5. Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献