Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital

Published:2016-06-17 Issue:6292 Volume:352 Page:1455-1459
ISSN:0036-8075
Container-title:Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Science

Author:

Ouyang Zhiyun¹,Zheng Hua¹,Xiao Yi¹,Polasky Stephen²,Liu Jianguo³,Xu Weihua¹,Wang Qiao⁴,Zhang Lu¹,Xiao Yang¹,Rao Enming¹,Jiang Ling¹,Lu Fei¹,Wang Xiaoke¹,Yang Guangbin⁵,Gong Shihan¹,Wu Bingfang⁶,Zeng Yuan⁶,Yang Wu⁷,Daily Gretchen C.⁸

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.

2. Department of Applied Economics and Natural Capital Project, Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

3. Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823-5243, USA.

4. Satellite Environment Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100094, China.

5. School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China.

6. Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Sciences, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

7. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

8. Department of Biology, Natural Capital Project, and Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Abstract

China's national ecosystem assessment China recently completed its first National Ecosystem Assessment covering the period 2000–2010. Ouyang et al. present the main findings of the assessment. Investment in the restoration and preservation of natural capital has resulted in improvements at the national level in most of the major ecosystem services measured. In particular, food production, carbon sequestration, and soil retention showed strong gains; on the other hand, habitat provision for biodiversity showed a gradual decline. Regional differences remain nonetheless, and there are serious environmental challenges still to be met in areas such as air quality and the wider global footprint of raw material imports. Science , this issue p. 1455

Funder

Ministry of Finance of China

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference97 articles.

1. The 1998 Yangtze Floods: The Use of Short-Term Forecasts in the Context of Seasonal to Interannual Water Resource Management

2. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services

3. China's Forest Policy for the 21st Century

4. J. Liu Z. Ouyang W. Yang W. Xu S. Li in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity S. A. Levin Ed. (Academic Press Waltham MA ed. 2 2013) pp. 372–384.

5. Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery

Cited by 1228 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mapping ecological resource use and supply-consumption difference in China from 2000 to 2020;Resources, Conservation and Recycling;2024-12

2. Assessing pollinator abundance and services to enhance agricultural sustainability and crop yield optimization in the Qilian Mountains;Agricultural Systems;2024-12

3. “Icing on the cake” or “fuel delivered in the snow”? Evidence from China on ecological compensation for air pollution control;Environmental Impact Assessment Review;2024-11

4. Exposure of water purification deficit network in response to nitrogen application intensity;Science of The Total Environment;2024-10

5. How has carbon storage changed in the Yili-Tianshan region over the past three decades and into the future? What has driven it to change?;Science of The Total Environment;2024-10