A Comparative Study of Mathematical Models for the Tropical Cyclone Intensity–Size Relation

Author:

Sun Jie1,Cai Ming1ORCID,Liu Guosheng1,Zhang Da-Lin2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

2. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Abstract

Despite considerable progress in tropical cyclone (TC) research, our current understanding and prediction capabilities regarding the TC intensity–size relation remain limited. This study systematically analyzes the key characteristics and performance of different types of mathematical models for TC intensity–size relations using the 6-hourly Tropical Cyclone Extended Best Track Dataset spanning 1988 to 2020. The models investigated include statistical, idealized (e.g., Rankine vortex), parametric, and theoretical models. In addition to directly comparing the solutions obtained from individual models to the observed TC records, we assess the models that can produce a unique finite-sized radial profile of surface winds for each TC record—a minimal requirement to ensure that the predicted radial profile of the surface winds would align with the observed profile. The results reveal that a sufficient condition to guarantee a unique radial profile of surface winds is that the associated model can be written as a radial invariant quantity, although it does not guarantee a finite-sized profile. Only the effective absolute angular momentum (eAAM) model, among all the models examined in this study, meets the minimum requirement. Furthermore, the solutions obtained from the eAAM model are well correlated with their observational counterparts (85 to 95%) with little systematic bias and small absolute mean errors that are very close to the observational resolution. The eAAM model’s ability to capture the complex intensity–size relation of observed TCs, in combination with these desirable features, suggests its high potential for gaining a better understanding of the underlying physics governing the observed TC intensity–size relation.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3