Investigation of a Novel Secondary Flow Feature in a Turbine Cascade With End Wall Profiling
Author:
Ingram Grant1, Gregory-Smith David1, Harvey Neil2
Affiliation:
1. School of Engineering, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 2. Rolls-Royce plc, Derby, DE24 8BJ UK
Abstract
A novel secondary flow feature, previously unreported for turbine blading as far as the authors are aware, has been discovered. It has been found that it is possible to separate part of the inlet boundary layer on the blade row end wall as it is being over-turned and rolled up into the passage vortex. This flow feature has been discovered during a continuing investigation into the aerodynamic effects of non-axisymmetric end wall profiling. Previous work, using the low speed linear cascade at Durham University, has shown the potential of end wall profiling for reducing secondary losses. The latest study, the results of which are described here, was undertaken to determine the limits of what end wall profiling can achieve. The flow has been investigated in detail with pressure probe traversing and surface flow visualization. This has found that the inlet boundary locally separates, on the early suction side of the passage, generating significant extra loss which feeds directly into the core of the passage vortex. The presence of this new feature gives rise to the unexpected result that the secondary flow, as determined by the exit flow angle deviations and levels of secondary kinetic energy, can be reduced while at the same time the loss is increased. CFD was found to calculate the secondary flows moderately well compared with measurements. However, CFD did not predict this new feature, nor the increase in loss it caused. It is concluded that the application of non-axisymmetric end wall profiling, although it has been shown to be highly beneficial, can give rise to adverse features that current CFD tools are unable to predict. Improvements to CFD capability are required in order to be able to avoid such features, and obtain the full potential of end wall profiling.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering
Reference15 articles.
1. Sieverding, C. H.
, 1985, “Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows In Turbine Blade Passages,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107, pp. 248–252. 2. Langston, L. S.
, 2001, “Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines-a Review,” Heat and Mass Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems, Trenie Iznos, 943, pp. 11–26. 3. Harvey, N. W., Rose, M. G., Shahpar, S., Taylor, M. D., Hartland, J., and Gregory-Smith, D. G., 2000, “Non-Axisymmetric Turbine End Wall Design: Part I Three-Dimensional Design System,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122, pp. 278–285. 4. Hartland, J., Gregory-Smith, D. G., Harvey, N. W., and Rose, M. G., 2000, “Non-Axisymmetric End Wall Design: Part II Experimental Validation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 122, pp. 286–293. 5. Ingram, G. L., Gregory-Smith, D. G., Rose, M. G., Harvey, N. W., and Brennan, G., 2002, “The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30339.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|