A Numerical Study of Aortic Flow Stability and Comparison With In Vivo Flow Measurements

Abstract

The development of an engineering transitional turbulence model and its subsequent evaluation and validation for some diseased cardiovascular flows have been suggestive of its likely utility in normal aortas. The existence of experimental data from human aortas, acquired in the early 1970s with catheter-mounted hot film velocimeters, provided the opportunity to compare the performance of the model on such flows. A generic human aorta, derived from magnetic resonance anatomical and velocity images of a young volunteer, was used as the basis for varying both Reynolds number (Re) and Womersley parameter (α) to match four experimental data points from human ascending aortas, comprising two with disturbed flow and two with apparently undisturbed flow. Trials were made with three different levels of inflow turbulence intensity (Tu) to find if a single level could represent the four different cases with 4000 < Re < 10,000 and 17 < α < 26. A necessary boundary condition includes the inflow “turbulence” level, and convincing results were obtained for all four cases with inflow Tu = 1.0%, providing additional confidence in the application of the transitional model in flows in larger arteries. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-based shear stress transport (SST) transitional model is capable of capturing the correct flow state in the human aorta when low inflow turbulence intensity (1.0%) is specified.