Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0300
Abstract
A computational method is presented for predicting the unsteady aerodynamic response of a vibrating blade row that is part of a multistage turbomachine. Most current unsteady aerodynamic theories model a single blade row isolated in an infinitely long duct. This assumption neglects the potentially important influence of neighboring blade rows. The present “coupled mode” analysis is an elegant and computationally efficient method for modeling neighboring blade row effects. Using this approach, the coupling between blade rows is modeled using a subset of the so-called spinning modes, i.e., pressure, vorticity, and entropy waves, which propagate between the blade rows. The blade rows themselves are represented by reflection and transmission coefficients. These coefficients describe how spinning modes interact with, and are scattered by, a given blade row. The coefficients can be calculated using any standard isolated blade row model; here we use a linearized full potential flow model together with rapid distortion theory to account for incident vortical gusts. The isolated blade row reflection and transmission coefficients, interrow coupling relationships, and appropriate boundary conditions are all assembled into a small sparse linear system of equations that describes the unsteady multistage flow. A number of numerical examples are presented to validate the method and to demonstrate the profound influence of neighboring blade rows on the aerodynamic damping of a cascade of vibrating airfoils.
Reference39 articles.
1. Adamczyk
J. J.
, and GoldsteinM. E., 1978, “Unsteady Flow in a Supersonic Cascade With Subsonic Leading Edge Locus,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 1248–1254.
2. Atassi
H. M.
, and GrzedzinskiJ., 1989, “Unsteady Disturbances of Streaming Motions Around Bodies,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 209, Dec., pp. 385–403.
3. Bateman
H.
, 1930, “Irrotational Motion of a Compressible Fluid,” Proc. National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 16, pp. 816–825.
4. Bo¨lcs, A., and Fransson, T. H., 1986, “Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines. Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Cascade Results,” AFOSR-TR-0605, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Washington, DC.
5. Buffum, D. H., 1993, “Blade Row Interaction Effects on Flutter and Forced Response,” AIAA Paper No. 93-2084.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献