Effect of Element Types on Failure Prediction Using a Stress-Based Forming Limit Curve

Author:

Hasan Raed Z.1,Kinsey Brad L.1,Tsukrov Igor1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire Kingsbury Hall, Room W101 33 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

Abstract

Strain-based forming limit diagrams (FLDs) are the traditional tool used to characterize the formability of materials for sheet metal forming processes. However, this failure criterion exhibits a significant strain path dependence. Alternatively, stress-based FLDs have been proposed and shown to be less sensitive to the deformation path. The stress-based failure criterion can be conveniently implemented in numerical simulations. However, for reliable numerical modeling, the sensitivity of the models to the selection of discretization parameters, in particular, the element type must be assessed. In this paper, Marciniak tests have been numerically simulated to investigate failure prediction using three different element types (shell, solid, and solid-shell). Seven different specimen geometries were modeled in order to vary the loading paths. The results show that despite differences in stress calculation assumptions, shell, solid, and solid-shell elements do not provide differences in failure prediction when a stress-based failure criterion is used.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference34 articles.

1. Plastic Instability and Fracture in Sheet Stretched Over Rigid Punches;Keeler;ASM Trans. Q.

2. Sheet Metal Forming Processes

3. Stress-Based Forming Limits in Sheet-Metal Forming;Stoughton;J. Eng. Mater. Technol.

4. Effect of Yield Criterion on Numerical Simulation Results Using a Stress-Based Failure Criterion;Sakash;J. Eng. Mater. Technol.

5. Limit Strains in the Processes of Stretch-Forming Sheet Metal;Marciniak;Int. J. Mech. Sci.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3