Affiliation:
1. DIEM, University of Bologna, Bologna 40136, Italy
Abstract
Many methodologies have been developed in the past for misfire detection purposes based on the analysis of the instantaneous engine speed. The missing combustion is usually detected, thanks to the sudden engine speed decrease that takes place after a misfire event. Misfire detection and, in particular, cylinder isolation are nevertheless still a challenging issue for engines with a high number of cylinders, for engine operating conditions at low load or high engine speed, and for multiple misfire events. When a misfire event takes place, a torsional vibration is excited and shows up in the instantaneous engine speed wave form. If a multiple misfire occurs, this torsional vibration is excited more than once in a very short time interval. The interaction between these successive vibrations can generate false alarms or misdetection, and an increased complexity when dealing with cylinder isolation. This paper presents the development of a powertrain torsional behavior model in order to identify the effects of a misfire event on the instantaneous engine speed signal. The identified wave form has then been used to filter out the torsional vibration effects in order to enlighten the missing combustions even in the case of multiple misfire events. The model response is also used to speed up the setup process for the detection algorithm employed, thus evaluating, before running specific experimental tests on a test bench facility, the values for the threshold and the optimal setup of the procedure. The proposed algorithm is developed in this paper for an SI L4 engine; its application to other engine configurations is possible, as is also discussed in this paper.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference17 articles.
1. California Air Resources Board, 1991, “Technical Status Update and Proposed Revisions to Malfunction and Diagnostic System Requirements Applicable to 1994 and Subsequent California Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles—(OBD II),” CARB Staff Report No. 91-37.
2. Ceccarani, M., Rebottini, C., and Bettini, R., 1998, “Engine Misfire Monitoring for a V12 Engine by Exhaust Gas Pressure Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980518.
3. Willimowski, M., and Isermann, R., 2000, “A Time Domain Based Diagnostic System for Misfire Detection in Spark-Ignition Engines by Exhaust Gas Pressure Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0366.
4. Lee, A., and Pyko, J. S., 1995, “Engine Misfire Detection by Ionization Current Monitoring,” SAE Technical Paper No. 950003.
5. Chung, Y., Bae, C., Choi, S., and Yoon, K., 1999, “Application of a Wide Range Oxygen Sensor for the Misfire Detection,” SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-1485.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献