Thrombogenicity Testing of Medical Devices in a Minimally Heparinized Ovine Blood Loop

Author:

Grove Kent1,Deline Steve M.1,Schatz Tim F.1,Howard Sarah E.1,Porter Deanna2,Smith Mark E.3

Affiliation:

1. American Preclinical Services, 8960 Evergreen Boulevard, NW, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 e-mail:

2. St. Jude Medical, 177 East County Road B, St. Paul, MN 55117 e-mail:

3. American Preclinical Services, 8945 Evergreen Boulevard, NW, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 e-mail:

Abstract

ISO 10993-4 in vivo thrombogenicity testing is frequently performed for regulatory approval of many blood-contacting medical devices and is often a key part of submission packages. Given the current state of in vivo thrombogenicity assays, a more robust and reproducible assay design, including in vitro models, is needed. This study describes an in vitro assay that integrates freshly harvested ovine blood containing minimal heparin in a closed pumped loop. To confirm the reproducibility of this assay, control materials were identified that elicited either a positive or a negative thrombogenic response. These controls demonstrated reproducibility in the resulting thrombogenicity scores with median scores of 5 and 0 for the positive and negative controls, respectively, which also demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.0001). For a direct comparison of the in vitro blood loop assay to the traditional in vivo nonanticoagulated venous implant (NAVI) assay, seven sheep were used as blood donors for the loop and then as subjects for an NAVI assay. In each assay—loop or NAVI—three study articles were used: the positive and negative controls and a marketed, approved catheter. The resulting thrombogenicity scores were similar when comparing the loop to the NAVI results. For each study article, the median thrombogenicity scores were the same in these two different assays, being 0, 1, and 5 for the negative control, the marketed catheter, and the positive control, respectively. These data suggest that the in vitro assay performs similarly to the in vivo NAVI assay. This in vitro blood loop method has the potential to predict a materials' in vivo thrombogenicity, can substantially de-risk the materials or coating selection process, and may eventually be able to replace the in vivo models currently in use.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference17 articles.

1. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 4: Selection of Tests for Interactions With Blood;ISO,2002

2. ASTM, 2009, “Standard Practice for Assessment of Hemolytic Properties of MATERIALS, Medical and Surgical Materials and Devices; Anesthetic and Respiratory Equipment; Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products,” American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. F7560-00.

3. Practical Approach to Blood Compatibility Assessments: General Considerations and Standards,2012

4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2014, “Methods for Thrombogenicity Testing,” Public Workshop, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak Campus, Silver Spring, MD, Apr. 14.http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/ucm387409.htm

5. ISO/DIS, 2016, “Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 4: Selection of Tests for Interactions With Blood,” Draft International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO/DIS 10993-4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3