Transient Response of a Short-Length (L/D = 0.2) Open-Ends Elastically Supported Squeeze Film Damper: Centered and Largely Off-Centered Whirl Motions
Author:
San Andrés Luis1, Den Sean2, Jeung Sung-Hwa3
Affiliation:
1. Mast–Childs Chair Professor Fellow ASME Turbomachinery Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 e-mail: 2. Mechanical Maintenance Engineer Formosa Plastics Corp., Point Comfort, TX 77978 e-mail: 3. Graduate Research Assistant Turbomachinery Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 e-mail:
Abstract
Commonly employed in air breathing (gas turbine) engines, squeeze film dampers (SFDs) reduce the amplitude of rotor vibration while traversing system critical speeds or in transient events such as during a maneuver load, a hard landing, a blade loss, or an engine startup/shutdown sequence that could instantaneously shift a damper journal eccentricity (es) to near its clearance (c). Experiments investigate the dynamic force performance of an open ends, short-length (L/D = 0.2) SFD test rig with radial clearance c = 267 μm and undergoing centered (es/c = 0) to largely off-centered (es/c → 1) whirl orbit motions induced by both a large static load plus a dynamic load. Four rods, symmetrically arranged to resemble a squirrel cage, elastically support the SFD test rig. A hydraulic load system displaces the test damper structure into static eccentricity (es/c). One of two types of dynamic load with amplitude FX = FY excite the SFD: a single-frequency, stepping from low frequency to high frequency discretely; or a sine-sweep frequency growing linearly with time at 6 Hz/s, 33 Hz/s, 40 Hz/s, or 55 Hz/s. For motions departing from es/c = 0.0, 0.95, and 0.99, the dynamic load uses a sine-sweep frequency varying from 5 Hz to 245 Hz and evolving rapidly at ∼33 Hz/s. Measurements of SFD displacements characterize the behavior of the SFD rig during its transient response which crosses two system natural frequencies. For motions departing from a largely off-centered condition (es → c), the dynamic load forces the damper to whirl with highly elliptical orbits, in particular while crossing a resonance (damped natural frequency). Moreover, the dynamic motions departing from es ∼ c are smaller in amplitude than those arising from a centered condition (es/c = 0). The larger damping produced by a very small squeeze film thickness explains the difference in response amplitude. At a largely off-centered condition (es/c = 0.99) and a low excitation frequency (f < 40 Hz), intermittent contact between the damper journal and its housing occurs as evidenced by a large magnitude recorded dynamic pressure (on the order of MPa). For whirl motions around various static eccentricity positions, es/c = 0.0–0.75, the dynamic load covers a frequency range from 10 Hz to 100 Hz using either a single-frequency excitation or a sine-sweep frequency excitation with a slow growth rate ∼6.5 Hz/s to induce a quasi-steady-state response. The experimental procedure builds complex stiffness in the frequency domain for identification of SFD stiffness, damping, and added mass force coefficients, (K, C, M)SFD. For motions centered around small to large static eccentricities, es/c = 0–0.75, the identified (K, C, M)SFD coefficients from sine-sweep frequency dynamic loads coincide with those extracted from single-frequency dynamic load tests over the same frequency range. Short-length SFD theory predictions for damping coefficients agree with the experimental results. Predicted added mass or inertia coefficients, like the model, fall short of the target experimental magnitudes. The test results give practitioners the credence to certify the ability of a SFD to control rotor response amplitude during typical transient events.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference17 articles.
1. The Effectiveness of Squeeze-Film Damper Bearings Supporting Rigid Rotors Without a Centralising Spring;Int. J. Mech. Sci.,1979 2. The Damping Capacity of a Sealed Squeeze Film Bearing;ASME J. Tribol.,1985 3. Zeidan, F. Y., Vance, J. M., and San Andrés, L., 1996, “Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery,” 25th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX, Sept. 17–19, pp. 169–188.http://198.65.5.186/pdf_files/papers/turbomachinery/tms_vol2518_1996.pdf 4. San Andrés, L., Jeung, S.-H., Den, S., and Savela, G., 2016, “Squeeze Film Dampers: An Experimental Appraisal of Their Dynamic Performance,” 1st Asia Turbomachinery and Pump Symposium, Singapore, Feb. 22–25. 5. The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations. Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features;Shock Vib. Dig.,2002
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|