Affiliation:
1. Warwick Digital Laboratory, WMG University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Abstract
Fixtures control the positions and orientations of parts in an assembly process. Inaccuracies of fixture locators or nonoptimal fixture layouts can result in the deviation of a workpiece from its design nominal and lead to overall product dimensional variability and low process yield. Major challenges involving the design of a set of fixture layouts for multistation assembly system can be enumerated into three categories: (1) high-dimensional design space since a large number of locators are involved in the multistation system, (2) large and complex design space for each locator since the design space represents the area of a particular part or subassembly surfaces on which a locator is placed, (here, the design space varies with a particular part design and is further expanded when parts are assembled into subassemblies), and (3) the nonlinear relations between locator nominal positions and key product characteristics. This paper presents a new approach to improve process yield by determining an optimum set of fixture layouts for a given multistation assembly system, which can satisfy (1) the part and subassembly locating stability in each fixture layout and (2) the fixture system robustness against environmental noises in order to minimize product dimensional variability. The proposed methodology is based on a two-step optimization which involves the integration of genetic algorithm and Hammersley sequence sampling. First, genetic algorithm is used for design space reduction by estimating the areas of optimal fixture locations in initial design spaces. Then, Hammersley sequence sampling uniformly samples the candidate sets of fixture layouts from those predetermined areas for the optimum. The process yield and part instability index are design objectives in evaluating candidate sets of fixture layouts. An industrial case study illustrates and validates the proposed methodology.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference35 articles.
1. A Mathematical Approach to Automatic Configuration of Machining Fixtures: Analysis and Synthesis;Chou;ASME J. Eng. Ind.
2. Shalon, D., Gossard, D., Ulrich, K., and Fitzpatrick, D., 1992, “Representing Geometric Variations in Complex Structural Assemblies on CAD Systems,” ASME Paper No. DE-44/2, pp. 121–132.
3. Time-based Competition in Manufacturing: Stream-of-Variation Analysis (SOVA) Methodology-Review;Ceglarek;International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
4. Dimensional Variation Reduction for Automotive Body Assembly;Ceglarek;Manuf. Rev.
5. State Space Modeling of Sheet Metal Assembly for Dimensional Control;Jin;ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献