On Fast-Response Probes: Part 2—Aerodynamic Probe Design Studies

Author:

Humm H. J.1,Gossweiler C. R.1,Gyarmathy G.1

Affiliation:

1. Turbomachinery Laboratory, ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

The influence of the probe size and geometry on the quality of fast-response measurements in turbomachines has been experimentally investigated. For investigations in the static domain (time-independent flows) probes were calibrated in two continuously operating wind tunnels in the range 0.2 < M < 1.2. For dynamic calibrations in time-variant flows model experiments in water (0.025 < k < 0.4, reduced frequency) were performed. Aerodynamic characteristics were determined for a great number of probe geometries, such as circular cylinders and wedge-type probes with varied apex angles, locations of the sensing holes, and leading edge shapes. The experiments comprised investigations in tolerance ranges for prismatic total pressure probes, yaw angle sensitivity, yaw angle, and Mach number effects on calibration and influence of dynamic yaw angle fluctuation on probe characteristics. As a result of the experiments errors due to static and dynamic aerodynamic effects could be quantified. The majority of the errors arising during measurements in turbomachines can be directly related to the probe size. An important number of these errors are systematic and can be analytically modeled and hence their influence corrected. In fluctuating flows the most severe measurement errors, which often may exceed the quantity of interest, are due to dynamic stall effects. This phenomenon, which is of transient nature and cannot be corrected, is typical for sharp wedge probes, but is not present with circular cylinders, and the effects are much smaller with very blunt wedges.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference16 articles.

1. Ainsworth, R. W., and Strickland, A. D., 1992, “Experimenting With Fast-Response Aerodynamic Probe Geometries,” Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines, Munich, Germany.

2. Beddoes, T. S., 1980, “A Qualitative Discussion of Dynamic Stall,” AGARD-R-679 Special Course on Unsteady Aerodynamics.

3. Browne, L. W. B., Antonia, R. A., and Chua, L. P., 1989, “Velocity Vector Cone Angle in Turbulent Flows,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 5.

4. Bryer, D. W., and Pankhurst, R. C., 1977, “Pressure Probes for Determining Wind Speed and Flow Direction,” National Physical Laboratory, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, United Kingdom.

5. Carr, L. W., McAllister, K. W., and McCroskey, W. J., 1976, “Dynamic Stall Experiments on Oscillating Airfoils,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3