A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe

Author:

Sumner David1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A9 Canada

Abstract

Two data-reduction methods were compared for the calibration of a seven-hole conical pressure probe in incompressible flow. The polynomial curve-fit method of Gallington and the direct-interpolation method of Zilliac were applied to the same set of calibration data, for a range of calibration grid spacings. The results showed that the choice of data-reduction method and the choice of calibration grid spacing each have an influence on the measurement uncertainty. At high flow angles, greater than 30 deg, where flow may separate from the leeward side of the probe, the direct-interpolation method was preferable. At low flow angles, less than 30 deg, where flow remains attached about the probe, neither data-reduction method had any advantage. For both methods, a calibration grid with a maximum interval of 10 deg was recommended. The Reynolds-number sensitivity of the probe began at Re=5000, based on probe diameter, and was independent of the data-reduction method or calibration grid spacing.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Reference18 articles.

1. Gallington, R. W. , 1980, “Measurement of very large flow angles with non-nulling seven-hole probe,” Aeronautics Digest, USAFA-TR-80-17, pp. 60–88.

2. Gerner, A. A., Maurer, C. L., and Gallington, R. W., 1984, “Non-nulling seven-hole probes for high-angle flow measurement,” Exp. Fluids, 2, pp. 95–103.

3. Zilliac, G. G. , 1993, “Modelling, calibration, and error analysis of seven-hole pressure probes,” Exp. Fluids, 14, pp. 104–120.

4. Gerner, A. A., and Maurer, C. L., 1982, “Calibration of seven-hole probes suitable for high angles in subsonic compressible flows,” AIAA Paper No. 82-0410.

5. Pettersson, B., 1987, “Calibration of seven-hole probes within Mach number range 0.50–1.30 in FFA high speed wind tunnel facility,” Proceedings of the International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 156–164.

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3