Effects of the Re-Entrant Bowl Geometry on a DI Turbocharged Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions—A CFD Approach
Author:
Venkateswaran S. Pasupathy1, Nagarajan G.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Anna University Chennai, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600 025, India
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of re-entrant bowl geometry on both engine performance and combustion efficiency in a direct injection (DI), turbocharged diesel engine for heavy-duty applications. The piston bowl design is one of the most important factors that affect the air–fuel mixing and the subsequent combustion and pollutant formation processes in a DI diesel engine. The bowl geometry and dimensions, such as the pip region, bowl lip area, and toroidal radius, are all known to have an effect on the in-cylinder mixing and combustion processes. Based on the idea of enhancing diffusion combustion at the later stage of the combustion period, three different bowl geometries, namely, bowl 1 (baseline), bowl 2, and bowl 3 were selected and investigated. All the other relevant parameters, namely, compression ratio, maximum diameter of the bowl, squish clearance and injection rate were kept constant. A commercial CFD code STAR-CD was used to model the in-cylinder flows and combustion process, and experimental results of the baseline bowl were used to validate the numerical model. The simulation results show that, bowl 3 enhance the turbulence and hence results in better air-fuel mixing among all three bowls in a DI diesel engine. As a result, the indicated specific fuel consumption and soot emission reduced although the NOx emission is increased owing to better mixing and a faster combustion process. Globally, since the reduction in soot is larger (−46% as regards baseline) than the increase in NOx (+15% as regards baseline), it can be concluded that bowl 3 is the best trade-off between performance and emissions.
Publisher
ASME International
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Aerospace Engineering,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Reference19 articles.
1. Montajir, M., Tsunemoto, H., Ishitani, H., and Minami, T., 2000, “Fuel Spray Behavior in a Small DI Diesel Engine: Effect of Combustion Chamber Geometry,” SAE Technical Paper Series, Advances in Diesel Fuel Injection and Sprays, SP-1498, SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0946. 2. Ikegami, M., Fukuda, M., Yoshihara, Y., and Kaneko, J., 1990, “Combustion Chamber Shape and Pressurized Injection in High-Speed Direct-Injection Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper Series, SAE Paper No. 900040. 3. Lin, L., Shulin, D., Jin, X., Jinxiang, W., and Xiaohong, G., 2000, “Effects of Combustion Chamber Geometry on In-Cylinder Air Motion and Performance in DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper Series, In-Cylinder Diesel Particulate and NOx Control 2000, SP-1508, SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0510. 4. Okazaki, T., Miyazaki, H., Sugimoto, M., Yamada, S., and Aketa, M., 1999, “CFD Approach for Optimum Design of DI Combustion System in Small Versatile Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper Series, SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3261, JSAE Paper No. 9938016. 5. Chen, A., Veshagh, A., and Wallace, S., 1998, “Intake Flow Predictions of a Transparent DI Diesel Engine,” Trans. SAE, SP-1330: Modeling of SI and Diesel Engines, SAE Paper No. 981020.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|