Comprehensive Well Test Interpretation Method, Process, and Multiple Solutions Analysis for Complicated Carbonate Reservoirs

Author:

Yang Renfeng1,Jiang Ruizhong2,Patil Shirish3,Liu Shun4,Gao Yihua5,Chen Han5,Sun Zhaobo6

Affiliation:

1. China University of Petroleum (East China); CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., No. 6, Taiyang Gong South Street, Beijing 100028, Chaoyang District, China

2. Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

3. Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia

4. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Stimulation Technology for Oil & Gas Reservoirs, Engineering Research Center of Development and Management for Low to Ultra-Low Permeability Oil & Gas Reservoirs in West China (Ministry of Education), Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China

5. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., No. 6, Taiyang Gong South Street, Beijing 100028, Chaoyang District, China

6. Tianjin Branch of CNOOC Ltd., No. 2121, Haichuan Street, Tianjin 300452, Tanggu District, China

Abstract

Abstract The main characteristic of the complicated carbonate reservoirs is notably strong heterogeneous, leading to a high uncertainty in formation parameter evaluation. The most reliable method for obtaining the dynamic parameters is well test interpretation. However, the well test curve shows similar characteristics for multi-layers reservoirs, dual-medium reservoirs, and carbonate reservoirs with lithology mixed sedimentation lithology. Sometimes the well test fitting result under the mentioned three kinds of models is satisfied, but the interpretation result is quite different. In order to reduce the parameter evaluation multiplicity, the synthetic identification and evaluation method for obtaining the physical parameters of the complicated carbonate reservoir was proposed, based on completion types, core analysis, lithology analysis, and well test results. The evaluation method distinguishes the different carbonate reservoir characteristics from similar well test responses by summarizing and classifying the completion method, reservoir fracture characteristics, and production logging test (PLT) results. The reliability of the proposed method is verified by an application of actual carbonate reservoir parameters evaluation. The proposed method can distinguish among multi-layers reservoirs, dual-medium, and complicated reservoirs with mixed sedimentation lithology whose main characteristic is that concavity existing in the pressure derivative curve. If the well test match results were satisfied enough which lead to the proposed method and process was ignored, the interpretation results and production performance prediction may deviate largely from the actual situation.

Funder

Innovation Fund of China National Offshore Oil Corporation

National Science and Technology Major Project

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3