Characterization of the Discrepancies Between Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and In-Silico Simulations of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics

Author:

Heidari Pahlavian Soroush1,Bunck Alexander C.2,Loth Francis1,Shane Tubbs R.345,Yiallourou Theresia6,Robert Kroeger Jan2,Heindel Walter7,Martin Bryn A.1

Affiliation:

1. Conquer Chiari Research Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325 e-mail:

2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne 50923, Germany e-mail:

3. Children’s of Alabama, Birmingham AL 35233

4. Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George’s University, St. George, Grenada

5. Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, Dundee University, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK e-mail:

6. Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, EPFL, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland e-mail:

7. Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster 48149, Germany e-mail:

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare subject-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with time-resolved three-directional (3D) velocity-encoded phase-contrast MRI (4D PCMRI) measurements of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) velocity field in the cervical spinal subarachnoid space (SSS). Three-dimensional models of the cervical SSS were constructed based on MRI image segmentation and anatomical measurements for a healthy subject and patient with Chiari I malformation. CFD was used to simulate the CSF motion and compared to the 4D PCMRI measurements. Four-dimensional PCMRI measurements had much greater CSF velocities compared to CFD simulations (1.4 to 5.6× greater). Four-dimensional PCMRI and CFD both showed anterior and anterolateral dominance of CSF velocities, although this flow feature was more pronounced in 4D PCMRI measurements compared to CFD. CSF flow jets were present near the nerve rootlets and denticulate ligaments (NRDL) in the CFD simulation. Flow jets were visible in the 4D PCMRI measurements, although they were not clearly attributable to nerve rootlets. Inclusion of spinal cord NRDL in the cervical SSS does not fully explain the differences between velocities obtained from 4D PCMRI measurements and CFD simulations.

Publisher

ASME International

Subject

Physiology (medical),Biomedical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3