The effect of beta blocker withdrawal on myocardial SPECT modeled from adenosine 13N-ammonia PET

Author:

Hoffmeister K.,Preuss R.,Weise R.,Burchert W.,Lindner O.

Abstract

SummaryAim: The effect of beta blockers (BB) on myocardial imaging has been studied in several SPECT and PET studies with divergent results concerning perfusion and impact on diagnostic accuracy. The present study evaluated the effect of BB withdrawal on virtual SPECT studies modeled from quantitative PET perfusion scans. Patients, methods: Data from 20 CAD patients scheduled for adenosine 13N-ammonia imaging with and without BB were considered. Modeling the uptake characteristics of 99mTc-MIBI, all parametric stress PET polarmaps were transferred to virtual 20-segment SPECT polarmaps. The SPECT studies were categorized with a 5-point score and read to assess the effect of the BB withdrawal on scan result and interpretation. Results: The SPECT analysis revealed a mean score of 6.0 ± 4.7 with, and of 5.9 ± 4.5 without BB (p = 0.84). In 260 (74.9%) segments the scores were equal in both conditions. Without BB a downstaging was recorded in 44 segments (12.7%), an upstaging in 43 segments (12.4%). An essentially different interpretation (shift from medical therapy recommendation to angiography) was recorded in one patient. In six cases the interpretation differed mildly. Conclusion: In the majority of patients studied, scan results and interpretation remain unchanged after discontinuation of the BB. Nevertheless, the segmental scan results are not uniformly affected. The recommendation to stop BBs prior to stress testing in order to ensure the highest MBF remains advisable. If temporary BB withdrawal is unfeasible due to contraindications, a tight clinical schedule, or because a patient forgot to withhold the BB, it is appropriate to perform adenosine stress testing according to the results of this study.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3