Applying Rapid Qualitative Analysis for Health Equity: Lessons Learned Using “EARS” With Latino Communities

Author:

St. George Sara M.1ORCID,Harkness Audrey R.2,Rodriguez-Diaz Carlos E.3,Weinstein Elliott R.4,Pavia Vanina1,Hamilton Alison B.56

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

2. University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies, Coral Gables, FL, USA

3. Department of Prevention and Community Health and Gill-Lebovic Center for Community Health in the Caribbean and Latin America, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

4. Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL

5. VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Qualitative research amplifies the voices of marginalized communities and thus plays a critical role in shaping our understanding of health inequities and their social determinants. Traditional qualitative approaches, such as grounded theory or thematic analysis, require extensive training and are time- and labor-intensive; as such, they may not be adequately suited to address healthy equity issues that require a swift response. Rapid qualitative analysis (RQA) is an action-oriented approach to qualitative data analysis that may be used when findings are needed to quickly inform practice. RQA capitalizes on using a team to summarize key points from qualitative data into matrices to explore relevant themes efficiently and systematically. In this paper, we provide case examples from our work applying RQA to health equity research with Latino communities to address community needs, such as responses to public health emergencies and the development of service delivery and technology interventions for infectious and chronic diseases. We draw from our collective experiences to share lessons learned and provide the following specific recommendations (“EARS”) to researchers interested in applying RQA for health equity research: (1) Employ RQA to address rapidly evolving, urgent, health equity challenges; (2) Assure quality and rigor throughout the RQA process; (3) Respond to barriers and problem-solve as needed; and (4) Strengthen community relationships before, during, and after using RQA. Overall, we advocate for the use of RQA to promote health equity due to its ability to integrate the vital perspectives of marginalized communities and efficiently respond to their needs.

Funder

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institute of Mental Health

Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

District of Columbia Center for AIDS Research

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

VA Health Services & Development

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference60 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3