A Comparison Between Responses From a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD Survey

Author:

Schonlau Matthias1,Zapert Kinga2,Simon Lisa Payne3,Sanstad Katherine Haynes4,Marcus Sue M.5,Adams John1,Spranca Mark1,Kan Hongjun6,Turner Rachel7,Berry Sandra H.1

Affiliation:

1. RAND

2. Harris Interactive

3. California HealthCare Foundation

4. University of California, San Francisco

5. Mt. Sinai School of Medicine

6. Ingenix

7. The Wellcome Trust

Abstract

The authors conducted a large-scale survey about health care twice, once as a web and once as a random digit dialing (RDD) phone survey. The web survey used a statistical technique, propensity scoring, to adjust for selection bias. Comparing the weighted responses from both surveys, there were no significant response differences in 8 of 37 questions. Web survey responses were significantly more likely to agree with RDD responses when the question asked about the respondent’s personal health (9 times more likely), was a factual question (9 times more likely), and only had two as opposed to multiple response categories (17 times more likely). For three questions, significant differences turned insignificant when adjacent categories of multicategory questions were combined. Factual questions tended to also be questions with two rather than multiple response categories. More study is needed to isolate the effects of these two factors more clearly.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Reference11 articles.

1. Survey Administration Effects?

2. Buckman, R. (2000, October 23). A matter of opinion. The Wall Street Journal Online[Electronic version].

3. Cochran, W. G. (1968). The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 24, 295-313.

4. Couper, M. P., Blair, J.& Triplett, T. (1999). Acomparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in U.S. statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 39-56.

5. Czaja, R., Blair, J.& Sebestik, J. P. (1982). Respondent selection in a telephone survey: Acomparison of three techniques. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 381-385.

Cited by 125 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3