A 30-nation investigation of lay heritability beliefs

Author:

Ferris Laura J.ORCID,Hornsey Matthew J.1,Morosoli José J.2ORCID,Milfont Taciano L.3,Barlow Fiona Kate1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Queensland, Australia

2. University College London, UK; The University of Queensland, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia

3. Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato, New Zealand

Abstract

Lay beliefs about human trait heritability are consequential for cooperation and social cohesion, yet there has been no global characterisation of these beliefs. Participants from 30 countries ( N = 6128) reported heritability beliefs for intelligence, personality, body weight and criminality, and transnational factors that could influence these beliefs were explored using public nation-level data. Globally, mean lay beliefs differ from published heritability ( h2) estimated by twin studies, with a worldwide majority overestimating the heritability of personality and intelligence, and underestimating body weight and criminality. Criminality was seen as substantially less attributable to genes than other traits. People from countries with high infant mortality tended to ascribe greater heritability for most traits, relative to people from low infant mortality countries. This study provides the first systematic foray into worldwide lay heritability beliefs. Future research must incorporate diverse global perspectives to further contextualise and extend upon these findings.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference89 articles.

1. 15 years of GWAS discovery: Realizing the promise

2. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps

3. Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization

4. Alper JS, Beckwith J (1993) Genetic fatalism and social policy: The implications of behavior genetics research. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 66(6): 511–524. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588854/

5. Age Differences in Genetic Knowledge, Health Literacy and Causal Beliefs for Health Conditions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3