Who Overrates, Who Underrates? Personality and Its Link to Self–Other Agreement of Leadership Effectiveness

Author:

Bergner Sabine1,Davda Alex2,Culpin Vicki2,Rybnicek Robert1

Affiliation:

1. University of Graz, Graz, Austria

2. Ashridge Business School, Ashridge, UK

Abstract

The study investigated if personality can explain why certain managers are prone to overrate or underrate their own effectiveness. Thus, the relationship between self–other agreement of effectiveness and personality was studied. In total, 214 managers completed a multisource feedback and provided personality data on the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Results show that more extraverted leaders overrated their effectiveness in relation to their supervisors but had more accurate perceptions when self–peer and self–subordinate ratings were compared. Leaders with an intuition preference had more accurate perceptions when comparing self and supervisor or subordinate ratings while leaders with judging preferences received lower subordinate than self-ratings. Findings show that personality partly explains why leaders overrate or underrate their effectiveness and thus can be used for understanding leaders’ careers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Business and International Management

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Appendix;The Science of Change;2024-10-22

2. What Next? The Call to Study Change;The Science of Change;2024-10-22

3. Leading Change at Multiple Levels (Principles 8, 9, and 10);The Science of Change;2024-10-22

4. Resonant Relationships Are the Context for Change (Principle 7);The Science of Change;2024-10-22

5. Exploring Possibilities: Experimenting and Practice to Mastery (Principle 6);The Science of Change;2024-10-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3