Pediatric Oncology Professionals’ Perceptions of Information Needs of Adolescent Patients With Cancer

Author:

Bradlyn Andrew S.1,Kato Pamela M.2,Beale Ivan L.3,Cole Steve4

Affiliation:

1. Health Behavior Research Center, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown

2. HopeLab, Palo Alto, CA

3. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia,

4. Division of Hematology-Oncology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles

Abstract

In contrast to the extensive research on the information needs of older patients with cancer, the question of what information is most relevant for adolescents seems to have been addressed in only one published study. The aim of the present study was to update and extend the sole previous survey of oncology professionals’ views about the information needs of adolescent patients. This was achieved by including professionals other than physicians, by structuring the questionnaire to show whether perceived information needs were different for the time of diagnosis versus during treatment, and by differentiating between the 6 cancer diagnoses most commonly affecting adolescents. Fifteen hundred surveys were distributed to pediatric cancer professionals, and 556 valid returns were analyzed. The main finding was that information was considered more important to provide during treatment than at the time of diagnosis. Also, medical information topics were generally considered more essential than psychological topics. The magnitude of this difference was influenced to a small extent by professional discipline, gender, age and experience of respondent, and whether the information was being given at diagnosis or during treatment. It is notable that whereas respondents generally were confident in their ability to communicate information, physicians rated themselves as better communicators at the time of diagnosis than during treatment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Pediatrics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3