Analytical Error of Home Glucose Monitors: A Comparison of 18 Systems

Author:

Johnson Roger N1,Baker John R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Green Lane and the National Women's Hospitals, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

In a quality review of 18 home blood glucose monitors, we measured the imprecision and incidence of significant error of 12 colorimetric and six amperometric systems by using capillary blood specimens from patients attending diabetes clinics. Imprecision at the mean glucose concentration found in the respective blood specimens (about 9 mmol/L) gave coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from 5·2 to 22·8%. Eight monitors including five of amperometric design had a CV of less than 10%. The incidence of significant error (defined as the proportion of specimens differing in value by more than 15% from a reference hexokinase assay of glucose in capillary blood) varied from 6 to 76%. Among the eight monitors identified as being most precise, the majority produced results that differed markedly from the reference assay, underlining the need for a common approach to calibration of home glucose monitors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of blood glucose meters in a New Zealand diabetes centre;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2009-05-19

2. The influence of glucose self-monitoring on glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus in Sudan;Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice;2006-10

3. Evaluation of four portable self-monitoring blood glucose meters;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2006-09-01

4. Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitors;Clinica Chimica Acta;2006-02

5. Model-based glycaemic control in critical care—A review of the state of the possible;Biomedical Signal Processing and Control;2006-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3