Replicate and repeat faecal immunochemical tests in symptomatic patients: A systematic review

Author:

Farkas Nicholas G1ORCID,Fraser Callum G2ORCID,Maclean William1,Jourdan Iain1,Rockall Tim1ORCID,Benton Sally C34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Minimal Access Therapy and Training Unit (MATTU), Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK

2. Centre for Research Into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Population Health and Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK

3. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services, Guildford, UK

4. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK

Abstract

Background Faecal Immunochemical tests (FITs) in the assessment of patients presenting with symptoms have generally used a single sample. Little evidence pertains to the use of replicate, where a number of tests are done prior to decision-making or repeat FIT, where additional FIT are performed following clinical decision-making. Overwhelmingly, research has focussed on FIT to help identify colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this review is to assess the available literature concerning replicate and repeat FIT in symptomatic patients to help generate consensus and guide future research. Methods The terms ‘faecal immunochemical test’ or ‘FIT’ were combined with ‘multiple’ or ‘repeat’. EMBASE, Medline and PubMed database and other searches were conducted. All papers published in English were included with no exclusion date limits until November 2021. Results Of the 161 initial papers screened, seven were included for review. Qualitative and quantitative FIT outcomes were assessed in the studies. The primary aims of most related to whether replicate FIT increased diagnostic yield of CRC, with colonoscopy used as the reference standard. One publication assessed the impact of a new COVID-adapted pathway on CRC detection. No consensus on replicate FIT was apparent. Some concluded that FITs may help minimise missed CRC diagnoses: others showed no increase in diagnostic yield of CRC. Conclusions Current evidence on replicate and repeat FIT is both minimal and conflicting. FIT is a superb clinical tool, but significant gaps surrounding application remain. Further studies relating to replicate and repeat FIT are required.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An observational study of replicate faecal immunochemical tests in the urgently referred symptomatic cohort;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2023-03-14

2. Efficacy and accuracy of faecal sampling by a digital rectal examination for faecal immunochemical testing;Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine;2023-03-09

3. Double faecal immunochemical testing in patients with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer;British Journal of Surgery;2023-02-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3