Double faecal immunochemical testing in patients with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer

Author:

Gerrard A D12ORCID,Maeda Y13ORCID,Miller J2,Gunn F2,Theodoratou E14,Noble C5,Porteous L6,Glancy S7,MacLean P7,Pattenden R8,Dunlop M G19,Din F V N12,Clark A,Collie M,Collins D,Duff M,Goodbrand S,Mander J,Ventham N,Paterson H,Potter M,Reddy C,Speake D,Shaban F,Smith G,Vaughan-Shaw P,

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK

2. Department of Colorectal surgery, Western General Hospital , Edinburgh , UK

3. Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital , Glasgow , UK

4. Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK

5. Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital , Edinburgh , UK

6. Lead GP for Cancer and Palliative Care, NHS Lothian , Edinburgh , UK

7. Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital , Edinburgh , UK

8. Department of Biochemistry, Western General Hospital , Edinburgh , UK

9. UK Colon Cancer Genetics Group, Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics & Cancer, Western General Hospital, The University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-directed pathways based on a single test have been implemented for symptomatic patients. However, with a single test, the sensitivity is 87 per cent at 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb) per g faeces. This aims of this study were to define the diagnostic performance of a single FIT, compared with double FIT in symptomatic populations. Methods Two sequential prospective patient cohorts referred with symptoms from primary care were studied. Patients in cohort 1 were sent a single FIT, and those in cohort 2 received two tests in succession before investigation. All patients were investigated, regardless of having a positive or negative test (threshold 10 µg Hb per g). Results In cohort 1, 2260 patients completed one FIT and investigation. The sensitivity of single FIT was 84.1 (95 per cent c.i. 73.3 to 91.8) per cent for colorectal cancer and 67.4 (61.0 to 73.4) per cent for significant bowel pathology. In cohort 2, 3426 patients completed at least one FIT, and 2637 completed both FITs and investigation. The sensitivity of double FIT was 96.6 (90.4 to 99.3) per cent for colorectal cancer and 83.0 (77.4 to 87.8) per cent for significant bowel pathology. The second FIT resulted in a 50.0 per cent reduction in cancers missed by the first FIT, and 30.0 per cent for significant bowel pathology. Correlation between faecal Hb level was only modest (rs = 0.58), and 16.8 per cent of double tests were discordant, 11.4 per cent in patients with colorectal cancer and 18.3 per cent in those with significant bowel pathology. Conclusion FIT in patients with high-risk symptoms twice in succession reduces missed significant colorectal pathology and has an acceptable workload impact.

Funder

Chief Scientist Office, Scotland

Cancer Research UK

Cancer Research UK Career Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3