Ethical Issues and Codes of Ethics: Views of Adult Education Practitioners in Canada and the United States

Author:

Gordon Wanda1,Sork Thomas J.2

Affiliation:

1. University College of the Fraser Valley, Chilliwack British Columbia,

2. University of British Columbia

Abstract

Although the ethics of practice has become increasingly visible in the adult education literature over the past two decades, little empirical research has been done to inform the dialogue and debate. The purpose of this study was to examine the views of adult education practitioners in British Columbia about the need for a code of ethics and about the ethical issues, concerns, and dilemmas experienced in their practice. The study was an approximate replication of research carried out in Indiana reported by McDonald and Wood. This study was undertaken to broaden the empirical database within adult education, provide further insight into the ethics of practice, and determine similarities and differences between Canadian and American adult educators in their encounters with ethical issues and their views about codes of ethics. Major findings confirm positive practitioner views about codes of ethics and are generally consistent with the findings reported by McDonald and Wood.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference41 articles.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. In the Crosshairs;Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership;2024-02-23

2. Establishing the adult learning sciences through a shared scientific attitude: A vision for the Future;New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development;2022-09

3. Fundamentos teóricos para una distinción clara entre el comportamiento ético y el normativo-moral en el desempeño profesional del psicólogo;Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana;2022-02-16

4. Moralische Probleme und ethische Fragen von Lehrenden der Erwachsenen- und Weiterbildung – Ein Modell für die Forschung zur erwachsenenpädagogischen Bereichsethik;Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung;2020-03-05

5. Conduct Learning Events Professionally;Increasing Learning & Development's Impact through Accreditation;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3