Social identity and support for defunding the police in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder

Author:

Jackson Jonathan12ORCID,Fine Adam3ORCID,Bradford Ben4,Trinkner Rick3

Affiliation:

1. London School of Economics, UK

2. University of Sydney Law School, Australia

3. Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

4. University College London, UK

Abstract

In the spring and summer of 2020, police in the United States killed Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and other unarmed people of color. In one of the largest social movements in the nation’s history, thousands engaged in public protests and called to defund or abolish the police. Debate about police racism and the need for reform intensified, with public opinion polls showing how polarized public attitudes were along traditional political lines. Analyzing data from a cross-sectional quota sample survey of 1,500 U.S. residents conducted in summer 2020, our findings confirmed the proposition that opposition and support for defunding the police was related to not only political views and superordinate identification with the group that the police prototypically represent, but also polarized intergroup identification with the police and the Black Lives Matter movement, as well as people’s perceptions of police procedural justice and systemic racism.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference73 articles.

1. Adams T. L., Li Y., Liu H. (2020). A replication of beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research – sometimes preferable to student groups. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 6, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00058

2. Turking in the time of COVID

3. A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check

4. Evidence of Rising Rates of Inattentiveness on Lucid in 2020

5. Racial resentment, crime concerns, and public attitudes toward defunding the police

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3