Abstract
Research, identification, and programs in gifted education have typically not accommodated the “tough bright,” described in this article as abused, neglected, and undernurtured—a subgroup in the “diversity” gifted education has been admonished to identify and serve. Qualitative analysis of language generated in structured interviews with a group of high-ability at-risk middle-school children (N = 11), who had not been identified for special programming, yielded information related to personal difficulties, perceived support, familiarity with danger and violence, home environment, school experiences, perceptions of the future, and resilience. Suggestions for identification and programming are based on findings in the study.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献