Affiliation:
1. King’s College London, UK
2. City, University of London, UK
Abstract
Recently in academia, and particularly in management and organization studies, there is more attention being paid to unpacking our own oppressive systems and practices. In this article, we join the conversation examining the pressures of academia by exploring how reflexivity can be elicited through engaging with theory. We draw on the theories and concepts of Paulo Freire to (re-)interpret how PhD students experience the material practices and symbolic systems of the business school. We use autoethnographic vignettes to engage with our personal experiences and stories as field-based researchers and PhD scholars in UK business schools. Through critical reflection and cooperation-based dialogue, we analyzed these experiences using Freire’s concepts of banking education and (de)humanization. This can be considered conscientização (conscientization), raising critical consciousness of our own experiences. We find that doctoral students suffer from processes of dehumanization in the business school, but they also reinforce these processes through social reproduction. We reflect on the need for solidarity and how an awareness of the role we play within the system can shift our thinking toward constructive social change.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference88 articles.
1. Adams R, Allegretti A (2023) Sunak to force English universities to cap numbers of students on “low-value” degrees. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/jul/14/rishi-sunak-force-english-universities-cap-low-value-degrees (accessed 16 July 2023).
2. Getting lost to find direction: Grounded theorizing and consciousness-raising in management education
3. Banerjee B (2022) Is it possible to decolonise the business curriculum? Times Higher Education Campus. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/it-possible-decolonise-business-curriculum (accessed 19 August 2022).
4. Mind: the gap – to advance CSR research, think about stakeholder cognition
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献