The Problem with Pluto

Author:

Messeri Lisa R.1

Affiliation:

1. MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Building E51-070, Cambridge, MA 02144, USA,

Abstract

In 2006, for the first time in its history, the International Astronomical Union defined the characteristics of a ‘planet’ in our Solar System and consequently demoted Pluto from ‘planet’ to ‘dwarf planet’. Scientific and popular discussion leading up to and following the formal definition of planet demonstrated that astronomers, amateurs, educators, and school children had been employing Pluto in different ways to construct multiple scientific and cultural cosmologies. Formalizing the definition brought these cosmologies into direct collision, necessarily privileging some cosmologies over others. The story of Pluto, from discovery to demotion, illustrates the discursive disruption that stemmed from forced consensus. Before ‘planet’ received a formal definition, it was a tacitly understood term that encompassed several meanings and acted as part of the contact language in a trading zone, as described by Peter Galison. Social groups were able to clearly communicate using the word ‘planet’ despite differing cosmologies. This paper takes a closer look at Pluto’s history, highlighting three moments when Pluto’s planetary status was challenged. Each moment — a controversial exhibit opening that excluded Pluto from the planetary display, the discovery of objects in the Solar System larger than Pluto, and the International Astronomical Union conference at which astronomers crafted the definition of planet — spurred discourse that accentuated conflicting cosmologies. Actors involved in these incidents directed the discussion in order to maintain clear communication or to make sure their cosmologies remained relevant. Only with the formal definition of planet, which excluded several popular and scientific cosmologies and shifted discussion about classification in our Solar System from a prototypical to an Aristotelian language, was Pluto demoted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3