Open peer commentaries to Leising et al., Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation

Abstract

The current collection comprises several comments to "Leising, D., Thielmann, I. Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science: How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation" (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029). In their target paper, Leising et al. presented a number of steps that personality researchers (and others) may take to improve the scientific standards in their field. Leising et al. answer to these comments in a rejoinder (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7961).