Affiliation:
1. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Abstract
International Relations benefits from historical comparative research. Although a historical comparative method can be fruitfully applied to the study of the European Union (EU), it is rarely undertaken. In this article, EU accession politics, particularly its 2004 enlargement, is compared with 19th century `standards of civilization' developed by European states concluding treaties with non-European nations. This article argues that EU accession politics operates in the legacies of 19th-century imperial rule. Understanding the EU in terms of an (new) empire might enrich the discussion of the perception and categorization of the EU as an international order.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE ERA OF THE breakup OF NEO-COLONIALISM;Вестник Удмуртского университета. Социология. Политология. Международные отношения;2024-09-12
2. EU Soft Power;SSRN Electronic Journal;2023
3. Between Law and Geopolitics;EU Common Foreign and Security Policy After Lisbon;2022-12-09
4. Introduction;EU Common Foreign and Security Policy After Lisbon;2022-12-09
5. From Political Liberalization to Geopolitical Turn (Evolution of the EU’S Discourse, and the Link between the Normative and the Material);World Economy and International Relations;2022