Impact of Automated Mobility-On-Demand on Weekly Activity Patterns: A Study of Singapore

Author:

Hermawan Karina1ORCID,Seshadri Ravi2ORCID,Sakai Takanori3ORCID,Zegras P. Christopher4,Ben-Akiva Moshe5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore, Singapore

2. Transport Division, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

3. Department of Logistics and Information Engineering, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

4. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

5. Intelligent Transportation Systems Lab/Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Abstract

The use of on-demand ride services has continued to grow rapidly in recent years. At some point, given current technologies of automation, it is plausible that these rides will be driverless, termed automated mobility-on-demand (AMoD). This research examines how eager people are to adopt AMoD ride services and whether they will change their travel behaviors and activity patterns when these services are available. We use data from the first ever activity-based stated preferences (SP) survey and estimate an ordered logit model to answer these questions. We demonstrate the capability of the unique SP survey data in capturing preferences toward an emerging transportation mode by considering the utilities of week-level activities and trips as functions of activity duration, scheduling preferences, travel disutility, and sociodemographic variables. Our key findings suggest that people do display a propensity to use the new AMoD services, but this propensity falls as more travel is undertaken with AMoD. Moreover, those who are likely to use AMoD tend to be car-less, young, and frequent users of ride-hailing services. They would typically use AMoD to perform additional leisure, personal, and meal activities, which may increase travel and travel costs. The model and results have important policy implications and applications.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference35 articles.

1. Pew Research Center. Ridehailing. Methodology. The American Trends Panel Survey Methodology. https://www.pewresearch.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/FT_18.01.04_RideHailing_ToplineMethodology.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2019.

2. GRAB. Grab Clocks 2 Billion Rides- Nine Months After Reaching its First. https://www.grab.com/ph/blog/news/grab-clocks-2-billion-rides-nine-months-after-reaching-itsfirst/. Accessed September 4, 2018.

3. CB Insights. 46 Corporations Working on Autonomous Vehicles. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/autonomous-driverless-vehicles-corporations-list/. Accessed September 4, 2018.

4. Future Mobility Survey

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3