Gaze Behaviors of Drivers Approaching Crosswalks with Different Sign and Crosswalk Treatments

Author:

Pike Adam M.1ORCID,Shirinzad Maryam1ORCID,Ananda Ramya Sura1,Pawar Abhishek Rajkumar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Signs and Marking Program, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX

Abstract

Where do drivers look when approaching crosswalk locations with different sign and crosswalk treatments? This paper explores the gaze behavior of drivers approaching crosswalk locations at two study areas. The closed course study area evaluated the observation of traffic control devices (TCDs) placed in an otherwise sparse environment. The campus course area evaluated TCDs placed in visually complex environments. Driver gaze behavior was investigated to determine how TCDs were viewed in both day and night conditions as the drivers approached the crosswalks. Researchers found that drivers generally looked at crosswalk markings for a longer time at night than during the day at both the closed course and campus course locations. Nighttime observations of traffic signs were significantly longer than daytime observations on the closed course area, but not significantly longer at the campus course. In general, the crosswalks were found to capture more gaze time than the signs. Signs captured less attention and, in some cases, no direct eye-gazes during the evaluation time frame. When considering the gaze patterns when no TCDs were present, there were typically increases in gazes at the signs. It was observed that gaze values were generally higher for the closed course where there was no traffic and minimal distractions. Distractions and complex driving environments may shift drivers’ attention from the roadway and TCDs, thus requiring the design, implementation, and maintenance of TCDs such that they are easily interpreted and not visually dissolved in the abundance of visual disturbances of a complex environment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference20 articles.

1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways [2012 revision]. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012.

2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts: 2019 Data. Pedestrians, May 2021. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Publication/813079.

3. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A review of driver gaze estimation and application in gaze behavior understanding;Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3