Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data

Author:

Dingus Thomas A.,Guo Feng,Lee Suzie,Antin Jonathan F.,Perez Miguel,Buchanan-King Mindy,Hankey Jonathan

Abstract

The accurate evaluation of crash causal factors can provide fundamental information for effective transportation policy, vehicle design, and driver education. Naturalistic driving (ND) data collected with multiple onboard video cameras and sensors provide a unique opportunity to evaluate risk factors during the seconds leading up to a crash. This paper uses a National Academy of Sciences-sponsored ND dataset comprising 905 injurious and property damage crash events, the magnitude of which allows the first direct analysis (to our knowledge) of causal factors using crashes only. The results show that crash causation has shifted dramatically in recent years, with driver-related factors (i.e., error, impairment, fatigue, and distraction) present in almost 90% of crashes. The results also definitively show that distraction is detrimental to driver safety, with handheld electronic devices having high use rates and risk.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference27 articles.

1. Singh S (2015) Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. Traffic Safety Facts Crash•Stats (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC), Report No. DOT HS 812 115

2. Dingus TA (2006) The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase II—Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC), Contract No. DTNH22-00-C-07007

3. Carney C (2015) Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Assess Vehicle-to-Vehicle Crashes Involving Fleet Drivers (AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC)

4. Carney C (2015) Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Assess the Prevalence of Environmental Factors and Driver Behaviors in Teen Driver Crashes (AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC)

5. Dingus TA (2015) Naturalistic Driving Study: Technical Coordination And Quality Control (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC), SHRP 2 Report No. S2-S06-RW-1

Cited by 702 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3