Test Format, Learning Confidence, and Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness

Author:

Boysen Guy A.1,Osgood Peyton N.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, McKendree University, Lebanon, IL, USA

Abstract

Background Both multiple-choice and short-answer tests can be beneficial to learning in the classroom. However, fact-based multiple-choice questions, because they include the correct answer as a response option, could lead to inflated estimates of learning and higher evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the effects of test format on perceptions of learning and teaching. Method Undergraduate students ( N = 123) completed either a multiple-choice or short-answer test based on a brief psychology lesson. Then, they predicted their performance on later tests of knowledge and evaluated the quality of the lesson. Results Taking a multiple-choice test led to predictions about future performance that were 10% higher than those taking a short-answer test. No consistent differences emerged in participants’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness between the two test formats. Conclusion These results suggest that test format may significantly influence students’ confidence in their ability to produce answers on future tests. Teaching Implications Teachers who want to take advantage of testing as a metacognitive learning tool should adopt question formats that utilize recall of information from memory without retrieval cues.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3