Research on the Lives of Persons with Disabilities

Author:

O'Day Bonnie1,Killeen Mary2

Affiliation:

1. CESSI, McLean, Virginia,

2. The Fielding Institute

Abstract

This article describes the significance of qualitative methodologies in capturing the complexities of the disability experience. The authors discuss some of the principles of qualitative research and show how those principles lend themselves to the new disability paradigm that has emerged in the last 20 years. They give examples of three disability studies in which qualitative methods were used to shed light on the complex interrelationships among physical impairment, societal barriers, and public programs. They also explore the underlying assumptions of both qualitative and quantitative approaches, emphasizing their ultimate compatibility and showing how each approach can complement the other to provide a more holistic view of the disability experience.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Health (social science)

Reference28 articles.

1. Campbell, D.T. (1975). Qualitative knowing in action research. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner (Eds.), The social context of methods (pp. 184—209). London : Croom Helm.

2. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

3. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.

Cited by 65 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3