Power, politics, and intervention theory: Lessons from organization studies

Author:

Blackler Frank1

Affiliation:

1. University of Lancaster

Abstract

Accounts of “double stimulation” and “ascent from the abstract to the concrete” as discussed in classroom and workshop studies tend to overlook the dynamics of power and politics. Such dynamics are more obvious in less controlled settings. Two reports of collective learning in work settings illustrate the point. In one, the “germ cell” of a new approach was heavily contested as people manoeuvred to establish the legitimacy of their contrasting positions. In the other, the “ascent” from the germ cell to new practice was contested, with entrenched attitudes and relationships blocking new developments. The relevance of such issues for activity theory is considered through a review of ways in which power and politics have been theorized in organization studies. Power can be conceptualized as both the medium for, and the product of, collective actions. Its study raises important questions about how learning interventions themselves should be understood and managed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Psychology

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Power as “Present-in-Actions” in Mundane Information Systems Work;Journal of the Association for Information Systems;2024

2. Toward a Power-Sensitive Conceptualization of Transformative Agency;Agency and Transformation;2023-11-30

3. Shaping local information in Thailand: Hidden contradictions in the digitisation activities of the Provincial University Library Network (PULINET);Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2022-12-29

4. TMT socio-demographic traits and employee satisfaction;The International Journal of Human Resource Management;2020-06-23

5. Power Implications Within Competitive Organizations;Handbook of Research on IT Applications for Strategic Competitive Advantage and Decision Making;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3