Developing an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnostic model and its utility for non-specialists’ diagnostic accuracy

Author:

Katsuki Masahito1ORCID,Shimazu Tomokazu2,Kikui Shoji3ORCID,Danno Daisuke3ORCID,Miyahara Junichi3,Takeshima Ryusaku4,Takeshima Eriko5,Shimazu Yuki6,Nakashima Takahiro7,Matsuo Mitsuhiro8,Takeshima Takao3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Niigata, Japan

2. Department of Neurology, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan

3. Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan

4. Department of Neurology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan

5. Department of Plastic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan

6. Department of Clinical Training, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

7. Department of Psychiatry, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan

8. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Abstract

Background Misdiagnoses of headache disorders are a serious issue. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence-based headache diagnosis model using a large questionnaire database in a specialized headache hospital. Methods Phase 1: We developed an artificial intelligence model based on a retrospective investigation of 4000 patients (2800 training and 1200 test dataset) diagnosed by headache specialists. Phase 2: The model’s efficacy and accuracy were validated. Five non-headache specialists first diagnosed headaches in 50 patients, who were then re-diagnosed using AI. The ground truth was the diagnosis by headache specialists. The diagnostic performance and concordance rates between headache specialists and non-specialists with or without artificial intelligence were evaluated. Results Phase 1: The model’s macro-average accuracy, sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and F values were 76.25%, 56.26%, 92.16%, 61.24%, and 56.88%, respectively, for the test dataset. Phase 2: Five non-specialists diagnosed headaches without artificial intelligence with 46% overall accuracy and 0.212 kappa for the ground truth. The statistically improved values with artificial intelligence were 83.20% and 0.678, respectively. Other diagnostic indexes were also improved. Conclusions Artificial intelligence improved the non-specialist diagnostic performance. Given the model’s limitations based on the data from a single center and the low diagnostic accuracy for secondary headaches, further data collection and validation are needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3