Preliminary External Validation Results of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Headache Diagnostic Model: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Author:

Okada Mariko1,Katsuki Masahito2ORCID,Shimazu Tomokazu3ORCID,Takeshima Takao4ORCID,Mitsufuji Takashi1,Ito Yasuo1ORCID,Ohbayashi Katsumi5,Imai Noboru6ORCID,Miyahara Junichi4,Matsumori Yasuhiko7,Nakazato Yoshihiko1,Fujita Kazuki8,Hoshino Eri3,Yamamoto Toshimasa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama 350-0495, Japan

2. Physical Education and Health Center, Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata 940-2137, Japan

3. Department of Neurology, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama 338-8577, Japan

4. Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka 556-0017, Japan

5. Ohbayashi Clinic, Tochigi 321-0933, Japan

6. Department of Neurology, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka 420-0853, Japan

7. Sendai Headache and Neurology Clinic, Sendai 982-0014, Japan

8. Department of Neurology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-8503, Japan

Abstract

The misdiagnosis of headache disorders is a serious issue, and AI-based headache model diagnoses with external validation are scarce. We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based headache diagnosis model using a database of 4000 patients’ questionnaires in a headache-specializing clinic and herein performed external validation prospectively. The validation cohort of 59 headache patients was prospectively collected from August 2023 to February 2024 at our or collaborating multicenter institutions. The ground truth was specialists’ diagnoses based on the initial questionnaire and at least a one-month headache diary after the initial consultation. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. The mean age was 42.55 ± 12.74 years, and 51/59 (86.67%) of the patients were female. No missing values were reported. Of the 59 patients, 56 (89.83%) had migraines or medication-overuse headaches, and 3 (5.08%) had tension-type headaches. No one had trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or other headaches. The models’ overall accuracy and kappa for the ground truth were 94.92% and 0.65 (95%CI 0.21–1.00), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F values for migraines were 98.21%, 66.67%, 98.21%, and 98.21%, respectively. There was disagreement between the AI diagnosis and the ground truth by headache specialists in two patients. This is the first external validation of the AI headache diagnosis model. Further data collection and external validation are required to strengthen and improve its performance in real-world settings.

Funder

Saitama Medical University

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3