Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Diagnostic Tests for Antibodies to Pseudorabies Virus Glycoprotein X

Abstract

The diagnostic performance of 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (gX-T, gX-H) for antibodies to pseudorabies virus (PRV) glycoprotein X (gX) were evaluated using 311 serum samples from a nonvaccinated quarantined herd. When the standardized virus neutralization (VN) test, which uses the Shope strain (VN Shope), was used as the comparative diagnostic standard, the gX-T test had a 7% false-negative rate and a 52% false-positive rate, and the gX-H test had a 19% false-negative rate and a 19% false-positive rate. When the VN test with a Bartha recombinant strain (VN Bartha gIIIKa) was used as the diagnostic standard, the gX-T test had a 9% false-negative rate and a 26% false-positive rate, and the gX-H test had a 24% false-negative rate and a 11% false-positive rate. Thus, the gX-T test was more sensitive and the gX-H test was more specific. Additional diagnostic tests on 79 serum samples from a noninfected herd did not produce false positives for the gX-H test, but there was an 8% false-positive rate for the gX-T test. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that VN Bartha gIIIKa has higher sensitivity than VN Shope, without losing specificity, and thus is a better comparative diagnostic standard. When adding a suspect range to the gX-T test, using the same criteria as the suspect range for the gX-H test, the false-positive rate of the gX-T test was reduced to 5% when evaluated versus VN Bartha gIIIKa in the infected herd and to 1% for the PRV-negative herd. However, 18% of the positive samples were classified as suspect (vs. 8% for the gX-H test). In PRV eradication programs, the cost of false negatives is greater than the cost of false positives; thus, the gX-T diagnostic used in this study is of greater diagnostic value.