Clinical nurses’ nasogastric feeding practices in adults: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in China

Author:

Xu Li-chun1,Huang Xiao-jin1,Lin Bi-xia2,Zheng Jun-yi3,Zhu Hai-hua4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

2. Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

3. Nursing Department of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

4. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate practices of nasogastric tube (NGT) intubation and feeding for adults by clinical nurses in China. Methods A self-designed and validated questionnaire comprising 30 questions was distributed to 560 clinical nurses in three comprehensive hospitals of Xiamen, China. The questionnaire covered participants’ demographic characteristics, NGT placement, administration of enteral nutrition (EN), and monitoring or management of feeding intolerance. Results A total 464 (82.9%) questionnaires were completed; 36.2% of nurses used nose–ear–xiphoid and 79.5% forehead–xiphoid measurement to define the internal length of the NGT. Many participants still used traditional methods to confirm NGT placement (auscultation of injected air 50.2%, bubble test 34.7% and observing feeding tube aspirate 34.3%). Bolus feeding was the most commonly used technique to administer EN. A total 97.0% of all nurses used syringes to measure gastric residual volume (GRV), and 62.7% measured GRV every 4–8 hours. The most frequently used GRV threshold values were 200 mL (44.6%) and 150 mL (25.2%). Most nurses stopped feeding immediately when encountering high GRV (84.3%) or diarrhea (45.0%). The nasogastric feeding practices of many clinical nurses were not consistent with international guidelines. Conclusions Our study can provide an impetus for nursing administrators to revise their nasogastric feeding procedures, to promote compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

Funder

Xiamen Municipal Science and Technology Bureau

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3