Between Police and Military

Author:

Lutterbeck Derek1

Affiliation:

1. Geneva Centre for Security Policy, Avenue de la Paix 7bis, Post Box 1295, CH-1211 Geneva 1, Switzerland.

Abstract

The differentiation between internal and external security, and between police and military, has been a core principle of the modern nationstate. A distinctive feature of the security landscape of the post-Cold War era, however, is that the dividing line between internal and external security has become increasingly blurred — a consequence of, inter alia, the emergence of a growing number of transnational risks and challenges. This article sheds light on a thus far somewhat neglected aspect of this convergence between the realms of internal and external security, or crime and war: the growing significance of intermediary, i.e. gendarmerie-type, or paramilitary, security forces. The main argument advanced in the following is that the post-Cold War period has witnessed not only the emergence of challenges which defy the distinction between internal and external security, but also the ascendance of agencies which are located between internal and external security forces. This development is exemplified by a discussion of two major areas of the contemporary security agenda, that of border control, where gendarmeries are being mobilized to counter various transnational challenges to security, and that of peace support operations, where they are playing an increasingly important role in post-war reconstruction efforts.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference8 articles.

1. Den Boer, Monica (1997) ‘Wearing the Inside Out: European Police Cooperation Between Internal and External Security’ , European Foreign Affairs Review 2: 491–508 .

2. Grieves, Forest L. (1972) ‘Der Bundesgrenzschutz — Overlooked Strength?’ , Military Review 2: 6–13 .

3. Hills, Alice (1998) ‘International Peace Support Operations and CIVPOL: Should there be a Permanent Global Gendarmerie’ , International Peacekeeping 5: 26–41 .

4. Hills, Alice (2001) ‘The Inherent Limits of Military Forces in Policing Peace Operations’ , International Peacekeeping 8: 86–91 .

5. Second generation multinational operations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3