Understanding contradictory styles of policing

Author:

Tamayo Arboleda Fernando León1ORCID,Valverde Mariana2

Affiliation:

1. Universidad de los Andes, Colombia

2. University of Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Policing scholars have shown that logics of police governance that appear mutually exclusive can coexist in the same space and time. Within police institutions, we can find more military-like mindsets alongside democratic rationalities. We here present a novel theoretical perspective for understanding such coexistence. Instead of attempting to identify police rationalities by reference to organizational/structural factors such as subcultures, training, or firearms and other equipment, we show that contradictory logics of policing can coexist within the same force by differentiating policing's targets by space, temporality, and identity. To do so, we use the idea of “chronotope” to identify and understand how police officers decide between conflicting rationalities of policing.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. La Ley de los Caballos de 1888: entre la búsqueda del “orden” y la construcción de un enemigo

2. La reforma policial en Venezuela

3. Ariza L (2021) Cali, nuestra nueva vorágine. Revista070, 11 May. Available at: https://cerosetenta.uniandes.edu.co/cali-nuestra-nueva-voragine/

4. High Policing and Low Policing: Remarks about the Policing of Political Activities

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3